A Wet Hot AI Summer: Decoding the U.S. AI Action Plan & the Agentic‑Bot Boom
If you stepped away from the screen / feed for even a moment this July, you might have missed two massive AI stories that could shape the near-term innovation in AI. First, the White House released its 2025 AI Action Plan—a 20 plus page blueprint built on three pillars: (1) Accelerate AI innovation, (2) Build national AI infrastructure, and (3) Lead global AI diplomacy. If that wasn’t news enough - just back on July 17th OpenAI, announced the roll out of its new “Agent” modes—autonomous-ish bots that promise to book your travel, manage your calendar, and even spend your money while you sleep. Joking aside - please be VERY careful about what sort of access, privacy, and information you give any automated service. Ask yourself “what would be the worst that could happen?” If the answer makes you cringe or sweat - don’t do that thing. Okay - PSA cautionary rant over… back to the episode notes.
In our latest Modem Futura episode, Andrew and I pull these threads together. We ask whether the Action Plan’s “build‑baby‑build” mantra—complete with massive semiconductor subsidies and calls to “remove regulatory barriers”—is a bold vision or reckless speed run. We also spotlight what’s missing: robust guard‑rails for deepfakes, algorithmic bias, and the colossal energy footprint of new data‑centers.
Switching to agentic AI, we run real‑time tests on OpenAI’s new Agent Mode and compare them with Manus’ more mature workflow. Yes, watching a bot open browser tabs for you is technically impressive—until you realize you can still do most tasks faster yourself . That friction sparks a wider debate:
Productivity paradox – Studies already show teachers and coders spending more time fact‑checking AI output than drafting from scratch.
Privacy trade‑offs – Granting an agent access to your email or bank account may save clicks now, but what’s the long‑term cost to autonomy?
Deepfake backlash – The Plan flags courtroom deepfakes as a national‑security risk, yet leaves broader social harms largely unaddressed.
Behind the policy prose and flashy demos lurks a wider narrative of tech nationalism. The document casts AI as a race the United States must win, positioning allies as followers and China as the ultimate adversary. That framing risks turning open research into a geopolitical arms sprint—one where ethical reflection gets lapped by hype.
So where does that leave forward‑thinking professionals, educators, and creators? We advocate to start the conversations now - here are some great starting topics to begin with:
Stay curious but critical. Piloting new agent tools is the best way to spot real value—and red flags—early.
Advocate for “responsible speed.” Innovation and regulation are not mutually exclusive; demand both from vendors and policymakers.
Own your data literacy. Whether you’re vetting deepfake evidence or AI‑generated lesson plans, will skepticism become a core career skill?
🎧 Tune in for the full discussion—including Hitchhiker’s Guide jokes, live agent fails, and pragmatic optimism about building a flourishing, not merely faster, future.
🎧 Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/4l7eCKC
📺 Watch us on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ModemFutura
If you’d like to dive deeper, jump into the link and listen to the podcast or watch the YouTube video. Join us as we explore the forces shaping our collective future and the urgent need to keep human values at the heart of innovation.
Subscribe and Connect!
Subscribe to Modem Futura on a favorite podcast platform, follow on LinkedIn, and join the conversation by sharing thoughts and questions. The medium may still be the massage, but everyone has a chance to shape how it kneads modern culture—and to decide what kind of global village we ultimately build.
🎧 Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/4l7eCKC
🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2fI044VpiPE3t4Y9MXrZjJ?si=mJ-xb414R3Ww7IkTOIlT0Q
📺 YouTube: https://youtu.be/6fcOiRYnIK8
🌐 Website: https://www.modemfutura.com/
